We take dry measuring cups for granted as cooks and bakers. Until a recipe calls for 1/3 cup flour, which you can’t find in your kitchen drawers. If you’re shopping for a new set, we discovered that design, material, and extras like soft grip on the handles make a difference when picking the best set of dry measuring cups.
Sure, precision is crucial. Of course, you need to know that when you measure out 1/3 cup flour or 1/2 cup sugar, you’re getting exactly that. That’s why we weighed the contents of each cup in each of the ten sets we tested. (It turns out a cup isn’t always a cup.) Some had serious design problems, such as sugar or flour collecting in the area where the handle connects to the cup, making measurement more difficult.
Our favorite sets are the most precise, have the best design, are durable enough for all your cooking needs, and are easy to use and clean. From start to end, they make cooking and baking simple and quick.
Best Dry Measuring Cup Sets
Best Overall: Norpro Stainless Steel 5-Piece Measuring Cup Set
Our initial impression was that this set was a novelty, but we were immediately won over by its simplicity. Pour sugar into the broader end, and then use the narrower end to scoop it out (or through the tiny spouts on both ends of the cups).
As a scoop, the form works great if you’re in a hurry and require a few tablespoons of flour from an open bag or container. One cup, 1.2 cup, 1/3 cup, and 1/4 cup sizes are all included in several of the 5-piece sets we examined. There is a 1/8 cup included in this one, which makes more sense as it isn’t a cup size you can measure with any of the other cups.
You can hold the cups together or pull one out with ease thanks to an easy-to-detach ring that comes with the set, which is constructed of stainless steel. On the packaging, we didn’t see any cleaning instructions, but we ran the set through the dishwasher without difficulty, and they washed up readily by hand.
Best Budget Pick: KitchenAid Classic Measuring Cups
There is more to this set than just a dash of color; it has a lot more to give than that. This 4-cup set of plastic measuring cups is up to the challenge. More durable than any of the other plastic cups we tried and with a great silicone grip on the handles and raised size numbers that won’t fade or rub off over time, this cup is a clear winner.
In terms of aesthetics, the wide round shape is both attractive and easy to measure without spilling, but the size and shape (the 1-cup size reminded us of our favorite coffee cup) could present a problem if you have limited room or shallow kitchen drawers.
Because of their thickness, the cups are quite durable for plastic, but we found that leveling didn’t always remove the sugar and flour that collected on the sides as we spooned it into the cups. BPA-free and dishwasher safe, this set is held together by an easy-release ring.
Runner Up: OXO Good Grips Stainless Steel Measuring Cups
The non-slip silicone handles on these measuring cups live true to their Good Grips moniker. There is no space between the handle and the cup, therefore there is no place for flour or sugar to accumulate, unlike some other versions.
The cups’ edges have a little lip that makes leveling and pouring a breeze. The dishwasher-safe round cups are a wonderful combination of strength and lightness. The cups are held together by magnets in the handles rather than a ring.
We were a little skeptical that this would hold up in our kitchen drawers, but after a little stomping around, they did. Despite the lack of five cups, this set is still an excellent choice.
Our Priorities in Testing: What we looked for in quality dry measuring cups?
Unlike a liquid measuring cup, a dry measuring cup comes with some benefits. There is no incidents of spillage of ingredients. But we tested our dry measuring cups considering their design, usability, durability, and more! Let’s find out how we tested the perfect dry measuring cups?
Ease of Use
We began by looking at the qualities that make measuring cups more user-friendly. –> Cupsets with flat bottoms and balanced handles got bonus marks since they make it easier to transfer ingredients from a bag to a bowl or to place a full cup down in the middle of preparation. The 1/4 cup was easily knocked over in the vast majority of sets.
After pouring honey into each cup, we tested how quickly the sticky substance spilled out when it was flipped over. In this case, we discovered that the use of a pour spout was ineffective; instead, a little silicone spatula is the best method for removing the last few grams of honey from the cup. If the handles, which were generally less than three inches long and nestled together beautifully, helped save drawer space, we noticed. To avoid the risk of losing our measuring cups, we prefer to keep our cups unbound by a ring, chain, or clasp, as cups are larger than spoons and too cumbersome when attached. In addition, a well-nested set of cups can be kept together in a drawer without difficulty.
Some dry ingredients can be accurately measured using the dip-and-sweep method. There are several factors that go into making a measuring cup easier to use. Sweeping the cup to level it is difficult if there are bumps or slopes between the handle and the bowl’s rim, making it even more inaccurate.
Preliminary durability tests found that scooping a cup of brown sugar was enough to bend the handles on an extra-flimsy set of spoons. If the cups are correct, the bad build quality won’t hold up, yet the set in question was also correct—coincidence? The most precise sets were put to the test against a 9-by-9-inch baking pan full of brown sugar that had been laid out to dry overnight. We tested how much the handles flexed under pressure by scooping up the hard sugar and packing it into each cup.
On the cups themselves, we took note of which designs were printed or painted on, as well as if they were actually stamped into the material. Stamped markings are superior than printed ones since they don’t fade with time, whereas printed ones do.
With components like flour and brown sugar that can be easily compressed (like flour and brown sugar) or that have natural fluctuations in density (like salt), a dry measuring cup is inherently incorrect, especially when dealing with varying densities. You can get anywhere from four to six ounces of flour if you give two cooks the identical 1-cup measure and ask them to measure out a full cup of all-purpose flour. When it comes to salt, different brands of kosher salt, or even half a cup of table salt, produce drastically varying levels of sodium when measured by volume. As a result, cakes may crumble, and meatballs may end up salty to the point of being unusable. There are times when only a scale will do (and any recipe that doesn’t take this into consideration by providing weight measurements is, ahem, not worth the salt it contains).
What testing accuracy did we follow?
It turns out that testing accuracy isn’t so simple. We began by looking for anything that could be measured in cups with an indisputable density. If you’re looking for a simple solution, water is the obvious choice. In theory, we may determine the volume of a measuring cup by filling it to the brim with water and then weighing it. As a result of the standardization of volumes, we can identify the measuring cups that are most closely aligned with the predetermined norm.
Choosing one of the multiple standards to adhere to was the first challenge. For domestic use, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Weights and Measures Division recommends rounding up to 240 milliliters, which is the equivalent of one “customary” cup. For nutrition labeling purposes, the FDA uses the same figures, equating 1 cup with 240 milliliters. One-cup measures are said to be equal to 240 milliliters by most kitchenware manufacturers. It was still unclear which standard we should use as a benchmark when we discovered a set of measuring cups with non-rounded-off conversions on their handles.